Thread: لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے فیصلے کی کوئی اہمیت نہیں

Home Forums Siasi Video لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے فیصلے کی کوئی اہمیت نہیں

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  nayab 1 month ago. This post has been viewed 73 times

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1
    Muhammad Hafeez
    Participant
    Offline
    Thread Starter
    • Professional
    • Threads: 501
    • Posts: 3451
    • Total Posts: 3952
    • Join Date:
      13 Oct, 2016

    Re: لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے فیصلے کی کوئی اہمیت نہیں

    سپریم کورٹ اپنے فیصلے میں سپیشل کورٹ کو عین آئینی قرار دے چکی ہے ، اس لئے لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے فیصلے کی کوئی اہمیت نہیں

    فیصلے میں واضح طور پر لکھا ہوا ہے کہ فیصلے میں واضح طور پر لکھا ہوا ہے کہ یہ عدالت پرویز مشرف کی ہٹ دھرمی کی وجہ سے اس کی غیر موجودگی میں بھی کام جاری رکھ سکتی ہے اس کا حوالہ عدالت نے اپنی پریس ریلیز میں بھی دیا ہے

    Civil Review Petition No.513/14 in Constitution Petition No.14/2013 “Lahore High Court Bar Association Vs General (R) Pervez Musharraf etc.” a three member Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan headed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Muneeb Akhtar had passed the following order on 01.04.2019:

    “7. ……………………For the above reasons, the Special Court shall proceed with the trial on the next date of hearing. In case, the accused surrenders and appears before the Court he would be entitled to record his statement under section 342 Cr. PC and lead any other defence under the law. However, in case the accused fails to appear on the next date of hearing, being a proclaimed offender, the Special Court is empowered to proceed against the accused even in his absence under section 9 of the Act.”

    PRESS RELEASE – Supreme Court of Pakistan
    Reference a news item carried by a section of the electronic and print media regarding an informal meeting of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan with the Press Association of the Supreme Court of Pakistan on 17.12.2019. Some misleading and out of context news items were aired/published by…
    http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk

    اسی طرح ایک اور مشہور عدالتی فیصلے
    Mehram Ali v. Federation Pakistan (PLD 1998 SC 1445)
    میں عدالت عظمیٰ قرار دے چکی ہے کہ گو خصوصی عدالت کو غیر آئینی تو قرار دیا جا سکتا ہے پر اسکےسزا فیصلے کو نہیں۔

    (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 10

    r/w. Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)

    Procedure and powers of Special Court—Security of person—Safeguard as to arrest and detention—Provision of S.19(10)(b), Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which provides for trail of an accused in absentia on account of his misbehaviour in the Court, is violative of Art. 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and thus invalid—Such declaration by supreme Court, however, will not affect the trials already conducted and conviction recorded under the act and the pending trial make continue subject to this order.

    Section 19(10)(b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which provides for trial of an accused in absentia on account of his misbehaviour in the Court, is violative of Article 10 of the Constitution and, therefore, is declared as invalid. [p. 1462] C

    Only clause (b) of subsection (10) of section 19 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 is violative of the fundamental right of access to justice. The above clause (b) of subsection (10) of section 19 authorises a Special Court to order the removal of an accused person from the Court if his behaviour is such as to impede the course of justice and then to proceed with the case in absentia. An accused person for his misbehaviour in Court can be convicted for contempt of Court and punished, but on no principle of law, he can be denied the right to be present and to defend himself in a criminal matte. The right of access to justice is a well recognised and inviolable right enshrined in Article 9 of the Constitution, which lays down that no person shall be deprived of life or liberty save in accordance with law. If an accused person is removed from the Court on account of his misbehaviour land in his absence the trial is concluded and he sentenced to death, he will be deprived of his life without due course of law. Secondly, under clause (1) of Article 10 of the Constitutional an accused person has the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice, in case he is arrested and detained.

    The above provision is violative of the above Constitutional provision having no legal effect. [p. 1488] S

    Such declaration by the Supreme Court, however, will not affect the trials already conducted and convictions recorded under the Act and the pending trials may continue subject to as above. [p. 1462] I

    P L D 1998 SC 1445
    MEHRAM ALI AND OTHERS v/s FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Frame (1) Per Ajmal Mian, C.J. (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 14 r/w Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997) Power to enter or sear…
    pakistanconstitutionlaw.com

    مجھے لگتا ہے لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے معزز ججز سے حکومتی وکیلوں نے یہ فیصلہ چھپایا اس پر ان ججز کے خلاف تادیبی کاروائی بھی ہوسکتی ہے

    #2
    nayab
    Participant
    Offline
    • Professional
    • Threads: 12
    • Posts: 1494
    • Total Posts: 1506
    • Join Date:
      24 Nov, 2016

    Re: لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے فیصلے کی کوئی اہمیت نہیں

    بھئ یہ عدالتی یا قانونی زبان کو سمجھنا کافی مشکل تھا تو اپنی آسانی اور سمجھنے کے لیے آج کا جنگ اخبار بھی اٹھا کر پڑھا کہ ہو سکتا ہے کہ ا نگلش میں کمزوری وجہ ہو مگر پھر بھی بے سود ثابت ہوا۔۔۔

    تبی ایک احماقانہ سا سوال آیا دماغ میں  کہ اگر یہ سزا غیر قانونی یا غیر آئینی تھی تو اتنے عرصے تک یا دوران کارروائی سپریم کورٹ نے کوئی  رد عمل کیوں ظاہر نہیں کیا یا اس خصوصی عدالت کی کوئی رہنمائی کیوں نہ کی تو جب تب نہ کی تو اب کیوں فصیلہ کا لعدم ہو گیا

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!